Propuesta 2: Fondo para Días Lluviosos
AUMENTA EL FONDO DE RESERVA DEL ESTADO.
Enmienda constitucional de la Legislatura. Un cambio a la Constitución de California que la Legislatura puso en la boleta.
En palabras sencillas
El estado debe aportar al Fondo para Días Lluviosos hasta que llegue al 10 por ciento de los impuestos del Fondo General. La Propuesta 2 sube esa meta al 20 por ciento. Exige depósitos más grandes cuando los impuestos sobre las ganancias de inversiones son muy altos. Los pagos adicionales de deuda se exigirían hasta 2040, y no hasta 2030, así que el estado podría hacer más de ellos. Hoy, esos pagos adicionales solo pueden usarse para pagar deudas de pensiones y de salud para jubilados. La Propuesta 2 también permitiría usarlos para cubrir pagos obligatorios a las escuelas y a los colegios comunitarios, devolver dinero prestado de otros fondos del estado y pagar ciertos préstamos federales. Los depósitos en el fondo no contarían para el límite de gastos del estado hasta que se retiren. Las reservas del presupuesto estatal serían más altas.
UN VOTO POR SÍ SIGNIFICA
Se modificarían las normas relativas a la constitución de reservas presupuestarias estatales y a la amortización de la deuda pública adicional. Por lo tanto, las reservas presupuestarias del estado serían mayores. Además, el estado se vería obligado a realizar pagos adicionales de la deuda durante más tiempo.
UN VOTO POR NO SIGNIFICA
No se modificarían las normas relativas a la constitución de reservas presupuestarias estatales y a la amortización de la deuda pública adicional.
Texto oficial en español de la Guía Oficial de Información para el Votante de California.
Fuente: guía oficial para el votanteRótulo oficial de la boleta
Las palabras exactas de su boleta. Toque para leer.
INCREASES STATE'S RAINY DAY FUND. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Increases California's Rainy Day Fund, approved by voters in 2014, to provide funding for education, health care, public safety, and other essential services during economic downturns. Fiscal Impact: State budget reserves would be higher.
Fuente: Registro de Votantes del Condado de Los Ángeles, medidas en la boleta
Texto oficial en inglés. Lea la guía oficial para el votante en español.
Argumentos oficiales
Escritos por quienes apoyan y quienes se oponen, e impresos palabra por palabra en la guía oficial estatal para el votante. Los argumentos impresos en esta página son las opiniones de sus autores y ninguna agencia oficial ha verificado su exactitud.
Texto oficial en inglés. Lea la guía oficial para el votante en español (PDF).
Argumento a favor
De quienes apoyanFirmado por Darrell Roberts, Jesse Gabriel, and Maria S. Salinas. Toque para leer.
VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION 2 TO PROTECT SCHOOLS, HEALTHCARE, PUBLIC SAFETY AND CALIFORNIA'S FINANCIAL FUTURE.
California's Rainy Day Fund, established by voters in 2014, was built for exactly this moment: an economy that swung our state budget from a $100 billion surplus to a $50 billion deficit in just a few years.
Proposition 2 strengthens that fund, so schools, healthcare, and public safety don't pay the price for Sacramento's boom-and-bust budgeting. Voting YES on Proposition 2 will:
DOUBLE THE STATE'S RESERVE REQUIREMENT - from 10 to 20 percent of General Fund revenues - so California has a real cushion, not a token one, when the next downturn hits.
STOP SACRAMENTO POLITICIANS FROM OVERSPENDING - When tax revenues spike, this measure forces politicians to budget smarter by requiring the state to bank more of that windfall instead of committing it to new ongoing spending California can't sustain.
GUARANTEE EDUCATION FUNDING IS PROTECTED IN THE STATE CONSTITUTION, even as reserves grow.
INCREASE FINANCIAL SECURITY - As Washington moves to cut billions in health care and food assistance funding, this measure will ensure California is better prepared to absorb those losses without slashing the programs Californians depend on.
This is not a partisan idea. Republicans and Democrats in the state Legislature and Governor Gavin Newsom support Proposition 2.
California's own nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office has recommended that the state should be saving significantly more than current rules require. Proposition 2 follows that advice.
Please join the California Professional Firefighters, small business organizations, and former Health Secretary Xavier Becerra in supporting Proposition 2 because they see, firsthand, what happens when reserves run dry: healthcare clinics closed, schools defunded, essential services cut, and fire protection slashed.
Saving for a rainy day is what California families do. It's what California's state government should do too. Vote YES on Proposition 2 - and make sure the next time the economy turns, California is ready.
Learn more at YesOnProp2.com.
Darrell Roberts, President
California Professional Firefighters
Jesse Gabriel, Chair
California State Assembly Budget Committee
Maria S. Salinas, CEO
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce
Respuesta al argumento a favor
De quienes se oponenFirmado por David Tangipa, Carl DeMaio, and Steven Choi. Toque para leer.
The supporters of Proposition 2 want you to believe this measure is about fiscal responsibility and protecting funding for education, public safety, and healthcare. Within 24 hours of introducing this measure, many of the same politicians who praised it as a way to build reserves also supported legislation to suspend more than $5 billion in required deposits into the state's savings account. Proposition 2 asks Californians to double the size of the savings account while making it less likely that taxpayers will receive the rebates they are constitutionally owed.
PROP. 2 MAKES TAXPAYER REBATES LESS LIKELY
State revenues that exceed constitutional spending limits must be returned to taxpayers. Proposition 2 creates a loophole, allowing politicians to shift billions into reserve accounts that no longer count towards the spending limit, making your rebate far less likely.
PROP. 2 DOES NOT GUARANTEE ANY NEW FUNDING FOR HEALTHCARE, EDUCATION OR PUBLIC SAFETY
Supporters claim Prop. 2 will protect education, healthcare, and public safety. Currently, it doesn't dedicate any new dollars to any of those priorities. Sacramento politicians will continue to decide how much to spend each year, not you. Prop. 2 only allows for politicians to spend more on pet projects.
Sacramento doesn't need another budget gimmick or wasteful spending. It needs the discipline to live within the constitutional limits that voters have already approved.
Vote NO on Proposition 2.
David Tangipa, Vice Chair
Assembly Budget Committee
Carl DeMaio, Chairman
Reform California
Steven Choi, Vice Chair
Senate Elections and Constitutional Amendments Committee
Argumento en contra
De quienes se oponenFirmado por David Tangipa, Steven Choi, and Carl DeMaio. Toque para leer.
Voting NO on Prop. 2 means more money in your pocket - and less wasteful spending!
PROP. 2 CREATES A SLUSH FUND FOR SACRAMENTO POLITICIANS
In 1978 California voters overwhelmingly voted to amend the state constitution to impose a spending limit on state politicians - and the politicians have hated that spending limit ever since. Prop. 2 allows the politicians to gut the voter-imposed spending limit. What the politicians dishonestly call a "rainy day fund" is actually a SLUSH FUND! Politicians can raid this new slush fund to feed their runaway spending habits.
PROP. 2 CANCELS YOUR TAX REBATE
California already has the highest taxes in the nation, but the state constitution requires that a tax rebate be provided to you when revenues exceed the spending limit. Prop. 2 creates loopholes and accounting gimmicks so politicians can eliminate any chance of you getting your tax rebate.
PROP. 2 ALLOWS FOR MORE WASTEFUL SPENDING
California's state budget has grown by 76% since 2018 - and the size of state government has mushroomed by 40% even after adjusting for inflation! Do you feel like you are getting 40% more services and benefits today than you did in 2018? Of course not! In fact, many core services to citizens have been gutted. We're spending more, but getting less.
That's because state politicians have diverted your tax dollars to boondoggle projects and no-bid contracts that reward their campaign contributors. Of the little money spent on important programs, too much of it is being lost because of fraud and wasteful spending. By eliminating the spending limit on politicians we will see even more wasteful spending.
PROP. 2 MAKES OUR BUDGET MORE VOLATILE
When times are good, the state is supposed to set money aside so families and businesses are not hit with tax increases, cuts to essential services, or budget chaos during the next economic downturn. Sacramento doesn't need a new tool to save money. It needs the discipline to follow the rules already in place and stop spending money it doesn't have. Prop. 2 makes our budget more volatile - putting us at greater risk of a financial crisis.
PROP. 2 IS OPPOSED BY TRUSTED BUDGET WATCHDOGS
Take a look at who is supporting Prop. 2: politicians who have repeatedly mismanaged our budget and special interests that get government contracts! Within 24 hours of putting it on the ballot, the politicians backing Prop. 2 voted to suspend more than $5 billion in required deposits into the state's budget reserve. In contrast, opponents of Prop. 2 are government accountability and transparency watchdogs - including the Reform California and the Transparency Foundation. Californians do not need another budget gimmick dressed up as reform. We need honest budgeting, reform of wasteful spending, and a real spending limit to hold politicians accountable.
VOTE NO ON PROP. 2.
David Tangipa, Vice Chair
Assembly Budget Committee
Steven Choi, Vice Chair
Senate Elections and Constitutional Amendment Committee
Carl DeMaio, Chairman
Reform California
Respuesta al argumento en contra
De quienes apoyanFirmado por Dr. Linda Darling-Hammond, Carmela Coyle, and Francisco J. Silva. Toque para leer.
PROPOSITION 2 PROTECTS CALIFORNIANS FROM BOOM-AND-BUST BUDGETS
Opponents say the state needs "discipline," not a new tool. But relying on their definition of "discipline" alone gave California a $100 billion surplus followed by a $50 billion deficit - exactly the boom-and-bust cycle Proposition 2 is designed to prevent. That instability, not this measure, is what leads to layoffs, healthcare cuts, slashed services, and tax hikes.
STOPS SACRAMENTO POLITICIANS FROM OVERSPENDING - Proposition 2 does not give Sacramento any new money to spend. On the contrary, it doubles the state's reserve requirement and forces more savings - rather than new spending - when tax revenues spike.
PROTECTS SCHOOLS, PUBLIC SAFETY, AND HEALTHCARE - When the economy slows, Proposition 2 helps protect funding for schools, hospitals, health clinics, and public safety instead of placing them first in line for cuts. The theoretical "rebate" opponents refer to relies on a 50-year-old accounting gimmick that rewards spending instead of saving. Proposition 2 closes that loophole and mandates a real 20% Rainy Day Fund.
Don't be fooled by those who call themselves "watchdogs." California's official nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office has recommended that the state expand the Rainy Day Fund to prevent boom-and-bust budget cycles. That's why Proposition 2 is backed by the California Professional Firefighters, small business advocates, health clinics, hospitals, and education leaders - people who understand what happens when reserves run dry.
VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION 2 - www.YesonProp2.com
Dr. Linda Darling-Hammond, President
California State Board of Education
Carmela Coyle, CEO
California Hospital Association
Francisco J. Silva, CEO
California Primary Care Association
Qué posición tienen los grupos
Todos los grupos de nuestra lista, por categoría. Cada posición enlaza a la guía publicada por el propio grupo.
Definiciones de las etiquetas Las citas son las propias palabras de cada grupo, copiadas exactamente.
Partidos políticos
10 grupos
Los partidos estatales y del condado son grupos separados y pueden tener posiciones distintas.
American Independent Party
Sin posición
American Independent Party Su guía, revisada el 15 de octubre de 2026California Democratic Party
Sí
Sus palabras: "Proposition 2: Support"
California Democratic Party Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026California Republican Party
No
Sus palabras: "prop 2: oppose"
California Republican Party Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Green Party of California
Neutral
Sus palabras: "The Green Party of California General Assembly Delegate have voted to take no position on Props 1,2, 5."
Green Party of California Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Green Party of LA County
Sin posición
Green Party of LA County Su guía, revisada el 15 de octubre de 2026LA County Democratic Party
Sí
Sus palabras: "STATEWIDE Prop 2 Save for California's Future Act YES"
LA County Democratic Party Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA Hispanic Republican Club
Sin posición
LA Hispanic Republican Club Dónde buscamos (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)Libertarian Party of California
No
Sus palabras: "Save for California's Future Act ❌ NO"
Libertarian Party of California Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Peace and Freedom Party
Sí
Sus palabras: "Prop 2 - YES - would increase the Budget Stabilization Account (BSA) (the Rainy Day Fund) cap from 10% of general fund revenue to 20%"
Peace and Freedom Party Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Republican Party of LA County
No
Su herramienta muestra: Prop 2: NO
Republican Party of LA County Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026
Medios de noticias
5 grupos
Estos son los únicos medios de noticias que encontramos con respaldos publicados para esta elección. Sugiera otro.
Knock LA
Sí
Sus palabras: "State Measure 2: Yes"
Knock LA Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026La Opinión
Sin posición
La Opinión Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Daily News
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 2: No"
Los Angeles Daily News Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Sentinel
Sí
Sus palabras: "Prop 2 | YES"
Los Angeles Sentinel Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Times
Sin posición
Los Angeles Times Dónde buscamos: la página de editoriales del LA Times (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)
Sindicatos
9 grupos
California Labor Federation
Sí
Sus palabras: "Prop 2: Increases State's Rainy Day Fund Recommend: SUPPORT"
California Labor Federation Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026California Teachers Association
Sin posición
California Teachers Association Su guía, revisada el 15 de octubre de 2026LA County Federation of Labor
Sí
Sus palabras: "Prop 2: Increases State's Rainy Day Fund - Yes"
LA County Federation of Labor Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA County Firefighters Local 1014
Sí
Sus palabras: "State Budget Rainy Day Fund - ACA 20 | ACA 20 is supported by Local 1014 and California Professional Firefighters (CPF). | We are supporting this measure on the ballot and in ballot arguments."
LA County Firefighters Local 1014 Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026LA/OC Building and Construction Trades Council
Sin posición
LA/OC Building and Construction Trades Council Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Police Protective League
Sin posición
Los Angeles Police Protective League Dónde buscamos (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)SEIU Local 721
Sí
Sus palabras: "2 Budget Stabilization Account Cap Increase and Gann Limit Changes Amendment SUPPORT"
SEIU Local 721 Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026UNITE HERE Local 11
Sí
Sus palabras: "Proposition 2: Increases State's Rainy Day Fund | Recommend: YES"
UNITE HERE Local 11 Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA)
No
Sus palabras: "NO | Prop 2 | Inflate budget reserve"
United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026
Organizaciones empresariales
3 grupos
BizFed (LA County Business Federation)
Sin posición
BizFed (LA County Business Federation) Dónde buscamos (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)CalChamber
Sí
Sus palabras: "Proposition 2: Increases State's Rainy-Day Fund (YES)"
CalChamber Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA Area Chamber of Commerce
Sí
Sus palabras: "Save for California's Future Act (Rainy Day Fund Expansion) | Expands the state's rainy day reserve fund cap from 10% to 20%. | SUPPORT"
LA Area Chamber of Commerce Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026
Grupos cívicos y de buen gobierno
1 grupo
League of Women Voters of California
Sí
Sus palabras: "Saving more during good years can help prevent deep cuts to public services during bad years."
League of Women Voters of California Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026
Grupos de causas y defensa
3 grupos
Abundant Housing LA
Sin posición
Abundant Housing LA Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026LA Forward
Sí
Sus palabras: "Proposition 2 - Rainy day fundSupport | Prop 2 is an important step for fiscal responsibility and LA Forward recommends you vote YES."
LA Forward Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Sierra Club Angeles Chapter
Sin posición
Sierra Club Angeles Chapter Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026
Enlaces oficiales
Sobre el resumen
Resumen redactado con IA a partir del análisis oficial y comparado con él mediante revisión automática. Lea el análisis oficial