Propuesta 43: Reglas de votación para impuestos locales
LIMITA LA CAPACIDAD DE LOS VOTANTES PARA AUMENTAR LOS INGRESOS DESTINADOS A LOS SERVICIOS DE LOS GOBIERNOS LOCALES
Enmienda constitucional de la Legislatura. Un cambio a la Constitución de California que la Legislatura puso en la boleta.
En palabras sencillas
La Propuesta 43 cambia los votos necesarios para aprobar algunos impuestos locales. Un impuesto especial es un impuesto que se reserva para un fin específico. Los gobiernos locales ya deben obtener la aprobación de dos tercios de los votantes para los impuestos especiales que ellos mismos ponen en la boleta. Pero decisiones recientes de los tribunales permiten que los impuestos especiales propuestos por los votantes se aprueben con el voto de la mayoría. A partir del 1 de enero de 2027, cualquier impuesto especial nuevo, aumentado o extendido que propongan los votantes necesitaría dos tercios de los votos. Esto hace más difícil que los gobiernos locales aprueben ciertos impuestos. Los ingresos por impuestos locales podrían ser menores en el futuro de lo que serían de otra manera. Se desconoce la cantidad. La Legislatura puso esta medida en la boleta.
UN VOTO POR SÍ SIGNIFICA
Algunos impuestos de los gobiernos locales requerirían la aprobación de dos tercios de los votantes.
UN VOTO POR NO SIGNIFICA
Algunos impuestos de los gobiernos locales podrían seguir siendo aprobados por los votantes por mayoría.
Texto oficial en español de la Guía Oficial de Información para el Votante de California.
Fuente: guía oficial para el votanteRótulo oficial de la boleta
Las palabras exactas de su boleta. Toque para leer.
LIMITS VOTERS' ABILITY TO RAISE REVENUES FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Limits voters' ability to pass voter-proposed local special taxes by increasing percentage of votes needed to approve such ballot measures from a majority (over 50%) to two-thirds, beginning January 1, 2027. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that local government tax revenues will not go up as much in the future due to a higher vote threshold for certain taxes.
Fuente: Registro de Votantes del Condado de Los Ángeles, medidas en la boleta
Texto oficial en inglés. Lea la guía oficial para el votante en español.
Argumentos oficiales
Escritos por quienes apoyan y quienes se oponen, e impresos palabra por palabra en la guía oficial estatal para el votante. Los argumentos impresos en esta página son las opiniones de sus autores y ninguna agencia oficial ha verificado su exactitud.
Texto oficial en inglés. Lea la guía oficial para el votante en español (PDF).
Argumento a favor
De quienes apoyanFirmado por Robert Gutierrez, Robert Rivinius, and Julian Canete. Toque para leer.
VOTE YES ON PROP. 43: THE LOCAL TAXPAYER PROTECTION ACT
California families are struggling with the highest income, sales, and gas taxes in the nation. Yet politicians and special interests keep pushing higher taxes that make our cost of living even more expensive.
We can't afford to pay ANY MORE in new or higher taxes. PROP. 43 RESTORES PROPOSITION 13 TAXPAYER PROTECTIONS
Proposition 13 was designed to make it harder to raise taxes, but court decisions created loopholes that allow special interests to impose massive new tax increases by circumventing the taxpayer protections voters approved. Californians are paying billions in new or higher taxes they would not have to pay if it weren't for these loopholes. Prop. 43 closes these loopholes and restores the two-thirds vote requirement to pass local special taxes.
PROP. 43 MAKES IT HARDER TO RAISE YOUR TAXES
Local governments have imposed over 2,000 new or higher taxes in the past decade, including higher sales, property and utility taxes - using the loopholes courts created in Prop. 13 to impose some of the most costly and damaging tax increases Californians face today.
These new and higher taxes make everything we buy or use more expensive, from food and gas to utilities and housing.
Prop. 43 guarantees voters the right to vote on all local taxes and restores the two-thirds vote for special local taxes.
PROP. 43 PROTECTS HOMEOWNERS FROM COSTLY NEW REAL ESTATE TAXES
California already has some of the highest housing costs in America, yet special interests are using court-created loopholes to add new taxes on the sale of homes, apartments and other real estate.
Some cities now charge real estate transfer taxes as high as 6%. For California's median-priced home of $900,000, that would cost a homeowner $54,000 simply for selling their house. Those costs steal homeowners' equity, raise apartment rents, and make building new housing more expensive.
Prop. 43 makes it much harder for special interests to impose these costly taxes on homeowners, renters, and small businesses.
PROP. 43 STOPS THE BAIT-AND-SWITCH TAX TRICKS
Politicians and special interests promise new taxes will fund schools, roads, and public safety - only to divert the money elsewhere and frustrate the will of voters. Prop. 43 requires governments to spend tax revenue for the specific purpose voters approved and restores the broad voter support required before politicians and special interests impose earmarked tax measures.
If taxpayers are asked to pay more, they deserve the right to vote and the confidence their money will be spent as promised.
PROP. 43 PUTS VOTERS BACK IN CHARGE
Every election, politicians say they need just one more tax increase. Prop. 43 simply ensures TAXPAYERS are fully protected by the right to vote on taxes.
Vote YES on Prop. 43:
• Affirms the voters' right to vote on all new or higher local taxes. • Restores the two-thirds vote requirement for local special taxes. • Protects Proposition 13 and closes court-created loopholes. • Makes it harder for special interests to raise taxes. • Protects homeowners, renters, and small businesses from new real estate taxes. • Strengthens accountability for how taxpayer dollars are spent.
Robert Gutierrez, President
California Taxpayers Association
Robert Rivinius, President
Family Business Association of California
Julian Canete, President
California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce
Respuesta al argumento a favor
De quienes se oponenFirmado por Nick Lapis, Bill Barnes, and Steve Frisch. Toque para leer.
We all want relief from California's high cost of living. But Proposition 43 doesn't cut your taxes a penny. It attacks something far more valuable: the power of your vote.
PROP. 43 WEAKENS YOUR VOTE.
Today, when local voters decide how to fund their communities, the majority rules. Prop. 43 throws that out, letting just 33.4% of voters veto what nearly 67% want. Under Prop. 43, a NO vote counts twice as much as a YES. That isn't fair, and it isn't democracy.
PROP. 43 DEEPENS THE HOUSING CRISIS.
Across California, communities vote to build affordable homes for working families, seniors, and veterans. They are helping renters stay housed and move people off the streets. Prop. 43 hands a small minority the power to block those solutions, even when a clear majority of your neighbors support them.
PROP. 43 TIES YOUR COMMUNITY'S HANDS.
Prop. 43 makes it harder for you to fund the critical local services your community counts on: staffing fire stations and 911 response, preparing neighborhoods for wildfire, repairing crumbling roads, keeping schools, parks, and libraries open, and protecting local hospitals and clinics as Washington cuts healthcare funding. When funding is blocked, help arrives slower, classrooms grow more crowded, and communities are left less safe.
KEEP THE POWER WHERE IT BELONGS - WITH YOU AND YOUR NEIGHBORS.
That's why teachers, nurses, firefighters, and housing advocates all oppose Prop. 43.
VOTE NO ON PROPOSITION 43.
www.NoProp43CA.com
Nick Lapis, Director of Advocacy
Californians Against Waste
Bill Barnes, Director of Campaigns & Community
Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California
Steve Frisch, President
Sierra Business Council
Argumento en contra
De quienes se oponenFirmado por Darrell Roberts, Chris Harkins, and Adam Weinberger. Toque para leer.
PROPOSITION 43 LIMITS VOTERS' ABILITY TO FUND ESSENTIAL LOCAL SERVICES.
Prop. 43 makes it harder for you to fund critical services like police and fire departments, fix and repair local roads, staff our local schools or backfill federal healthcare cuts. Prop. 43 undermines the voice of voters and the majority vote by letting just one-third of voters (33.4%) block local voter decisions - and it makes it easier for corporate special interests to avoid paying their fair share.
PROP. 43 MAKES IT HARDER TO FUND FIRE AND POLICE SERVICES.
Local police and firefighters can't rely on Sacramento or Washington politicians. These services are funded at the local level. Prop. 43 wants to make it harder for local voters to direct new funding to services like police and fire. Without adequate funding, 911 response times are slower, fire stations sit understaffed, and families wait longer for help when every second counts. When a house fire breaks out - or a wildfire threatens our neighborhoods - that local funding is what protects us. Prop. 43 would let a small minority of voters block it. Even if 66% of voters say yes, Prop. 43 would prevent us from funding desperately needed local services.
PROP. 43 MAKES IT HARDER TO FIX ROADS, FUND SCHOOLS, AND PROTECT HEALTHCARE.
Across California, local voters have come together to repair crumbling roads and improve transportation, to fund their neighborhood schools, and to protect local hospitals and healthcare - especially as Washington cuts federal health funding. These are decisions communities make for themselves, by majority vote. Instead, Prop. 43 hands a small group of voters the power to veto those solutions, even when the majority supports them.
PROP. 43 EMPOWERS 33.4% OF VOTERS OVER THE WILL OF THE MAJORITY.
In America, we believe in one person, one vote - and the majority wins. Prop. 43 throws that out. It empowers just over one-third of voters to block what nearly 67% want. It puts the out-voted minority in charge - even if they are extremists. It makes their NO vote count twice as much as a YES vote.
CORPORATE DONORS BENEFIT. NOT TAXPAYERS.
Under Prop. 43, corporate donors who spend big in elections will benefit most. Right now, voters can hold these corporations and developers accountable at the ballot box, and make them pay their fair share for local needs. Prop. 43 is designed to take that power away - to protect the powerful few, at everyone else's expense.
That's why these organizations are asking you to vote NO on Prop. 43:
• California Professional Firefighters • Californians Against Waste • California Federation of Teachers • California School Employees Association • Communities for a Better Environment • AAPI Force • Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California • Nurses Alliance of SEIU California • Sierra Business Council
Vote NO to protect your vote and majority rule. Keep the power where it belongs - with you and your neighbors.
VOTE NO ON PROPOSITION 43.
www.NoProp43CA.com
Darrell Roberts, President
California Professional Firefighters
Chris Harkins, Executive Director
Nurse Alliance of SEIU California
Adam Weinberger, President
California School Employees Association
Respuesta al argumento en contra
De quienes apoyanFirmado por Jon Coupal, Michael Hedges, and Greg Van Dyke. Toque para leer.
VOTE YES ON PROP. 43 TO RESTORE TAXPAYER PROTECTIONS
Californians already pay high taxes. But instead of prioritizing funding for critical services like police and fire, local politicians waste your money on their pet projects - then demand tax increases, claiming the need to fund the most important priorities.
The state Constitution requires a two-thirds vote for taxes earmarked for a specific purpose, but recent court decisions created a loophole that allowed special taxes to pass with fewer votes. Now Californians are paying billions in taxes they should not have had to pay.
Prop. 43 RESTORES the longstanding two-thirds vote requirement for local special taxes, protecting homeowners, renters, and small businesses from costly new sales and parcel taxes, taxes on electricity and gas, and real estate taxes.
Prop. 43 GUARANTEES taxpayers the right to vote on new or higher local taxes and requires governments to spend taxpayer dollars for the specific purposes voters approved - preventing bait-and-switch schemes that make our sky-high cost of living even worse.
Over the last decade, local governments have imposed 2,000 new or higher taxes. Prop. 43 CLOSES LOOPHOLES used to pass some of the most damaging tax increases, restores the protections voters originally approved under Proposition 13, and makes it harder for special interests to raise taxes without broad voter support.
The Legislature's nearly unanimous vote to place Prop. 43 on the ballot sends a clear message: activist courts exceeded voters' intent by creating loopholes that weakened Proposition 13's protections.
Restore your right to vote on ALL local taxes.
VOTE YES ON PROP. 43
Jon Coupal, President
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
Michael Hedges, President
California Small Business Association
Greg Van Dyke, Chairman
California Consumer Advocates for Affordability and
Safety
Qué posición tienen los grupos
Todos los grupos de nuestra lista, por categoría. Cada posición enlaza a la guía publicada por el propio grupo.
Definiciones de las etiquetas Las citas son las propias palabras de cada grupo, copiadas exactamente.
Partidos políticos
10 grupos
Los partidos estatales y del condado son grupos separados y pueden tener posiciones distintas.
American Independent Party
Sin posición
American Independent Party Su guía, revisada el 15 de octubre de 2026California Democratic Party
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 43: Oppose"
California Democratic Party Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026California Republican Party
Sí
Sus palabras: "Prop 43: support"
California Republican Party Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Green Party of California
No
Sus palabras: "NO on Prop 43: Supermajority on New Taxes"
Green Party of California Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Green Party of LA County
Sin posición
Green Party of LA County Su guía, revisada el 15 de octubre de 2026LA County Democratic Party
No
Sus palabras: "STATEWIDE Prop 43 Two-Thirds Vote Requirement for Local Special Tax Initiatives and Property Tax Initiative Prohibition Amendment NO"
LA County Democratic Party Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA Hispanic Republican Club
Sin posición
LA Hispanic Republican Club Dónde buscamos (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)Libertarian Party of California
Sí
Sus palabras: "Limit Local Taxes ✅ YES"
Libertarian Party of California Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Peace and Freedom Party
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 43 - NO - would require supermajorities for local initiatives to enact taxes whose proceeds are dedicated to a specified purpose."
Peace and Freedom Party Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Republican Party of LA County
Sí
Su herramienta muestra: Prop 43: YES
Republican Party of LA County Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026
Medios de noticias
5 grupos
Estos son los únicos medios de noticias que encontramos con respaldos publicados para esta elección. Sugiera otro.
Knock LA
No
Sus palabras: "State Measure 43: No"
Knock LA Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026La Opinión
Sin posición
La Opinión Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Daily News
Sí
Sus palabras: "Proposition 43: Yes"
Los Angeles Daily News Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Sentinel
No
Sus palabras: "Prop 43 | NO"
Los Angeles Sentinel Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Times
Sin posición
Los Angeles Times Dónde buscamos: la página de editoriales del LA Times (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)
Sindicatos
9 grupos
California Labor Federation
No
Sus palabras: "Prop 43: Limits Voters' Ability to Raise Revenues for Local Services Recommend: OPPOSE"
California Labor Federation Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026California Teachers Association
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 43 - Local Taxes Limitations (ACA 22) Oppose"
California Teachers Association Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA County Federation of Labor
No
Sus palabras: "Prop 43: Limits Voters' Ability to Raise Revenues for Local Services - No"
LA County Federation of Labor Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA County Firefighters Local 1014
Sin posición
LA County Firefighters Local 1014 Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026LA/OC Building and Construction Trades Council
No
Sus palabras: "2026 NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION ENDORSEMENTS | PROP. 43 Higher Threshold for Local Special Taxes OPPOSE"
LA/OC Building and Construction Trades Council Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Police Protective League
Sin posición
Los Angeles Police Protective League Dónde buscamos (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)SEIU Local 721
No
Sus palabras: "43 Two-Thirds Vote Requirement for Local Special Tax Initiatives and Property Tax Initiative Prohibition Amendment OPPOSE"
SEIU Local 721 Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026UNITE HERE Local 11
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 43: Limits Voters' Ability to Raise Revenues for Local Services | Recommend: NO"
UNITE HERE Local 11 Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA)
No
Sus palabras: "NO | Prop 43 | Raise vote threshold for funding public services"
United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026
Organizaciones empresariales
3 grupos
BizFed (LA County Business Federation)
Sin posición
BizFed (LA County Business Federation) Dónde buscamos (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)CalChamber
Sí
Sus palabras: "Proposition 43: Limits Voters' Ability to Raise Revenues for Local Government Services (YES)"
CalChamber Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA Area Chamber of Commerce
Sí
Sus palabras: "Local Taxpayer Protection Act - Two-Thirds Vote for Citizen-Initiated Special Taxes | Raises the threshold for citizen-driven special tax ballot initiatives to pass from a simple majority to two-thirds supermajority. | SUPPORT"
LA Area Chamber of Commerce Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026
Grupos cívicos y de buen gobierno
1 grupo
League of Women Voters of California
No
Sus palabras: "Prop 43 would make it harder for communities to raise revenue for public services by allowing a minority of voters to block local tax measures."
League of Women Voters of California Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026
Grupos de causas y defensa
3 grupos
Abundant Housing LA
No
Sus palabras: "PROPOSITION 43 | LIMITS VOTERS' ABILITY TO RAISE | Staff recommendation: No"
Abundant Housing LA Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026LA Forward
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 43 - Raise tax threshold for special taxesOppose | LA Forward strongly recommends a NO vote."
LA Forward Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Sierra Club Angeles Chapter
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 43 - Voting thresholds for special taxes | Oppose"
Sierra Club Angeles Chapter Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026
Enlaces oficiales
Sobre el resumen
Resumen redactado con IA a partir del análisis oficial y comparado con él mediante revisión automática. Lea el análisis oficial