Propuesta 42: Impuestos sobre bienes personales
PROHÍBE NUEVOS IMPUESTOS ESTATALES SOBRE LOS BIENES PERSONALES Y CIERTOS IMPUESTOS ESTATALES RETROACTIVOS.
Enmienda constitucional por iniciativa. Un cambio a la Constitución de California que los votantes pusieron en la boleta al firmar peticiones.
En palabras sencillas
La Propuesta 42 reformaría la Constitución del estado. Prohibiría nuevos impuestos estatales por poseer bienes personales. Los bienes personales son todo lo que las personas poseen, excepto los bienes raíces. Esto incluye activos financieros como acciones y cuentas de jubilación, que hoy no pagan impuestos por ser propiedad de una persona. La medida también limitaría los nuevos impuestos estatales que se aplican de forma retroactiva, es decir, a hechos que ocurrieron en el pasado. Se aplicaría a los nuevos impuestos aprobados o que entren en vigor el 1 de enero de 2026 o después de esa fecha. Los impuestos aprobados después del 1 de enero de 2026 que estén en conflicto con la medida quedarían anulados. Podría reducir los ingresos futuros por impuestos, pero no está claro cuándo ni en qué cantidad. Si recibe más votos a favor que la Propuesta 40, los tribunales podrían impedir que la Propuesta 40 se convierta en ley.
UN VOTO POR SÍ SIGNIFICA
Un voto por SÍ en esta medida significa: El estado no podría establecer nuevos impuestos sobre la propiedad de activos financieros u otros bienes personales.
UN VOTO POR NO SIGNIFICA
Un voto por NO en esta medida significa: El estado continuaría teniendo la opción de establecer nuevos impuestos sobre la propiedad de activos financieros u otros bienes personales.
Texto oficial en español de la Guía Oficial de Información para el Votante de California.
Fuente: guía oficial para el votanteRótulo oficial de la boleta
Las palabras exactas de su boleta. Toque para leer.
PROHIBITS NEW STATE PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES AND CERTAIN RETROACTIVE STATE TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Prohibits any new state tax (1) imposed on the ownership of personal property (all things people own other than real estate), or (2) that applies retroactively based on taxpayer's past activities. Nullifies taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that conflict with this measure. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that tax revenues will not go up as much in the future.
Fuente: Registro de Votantes del Condado de Los Ángeles, medidas en la boleta
Texto oficial en inglés. Lea la guía oficial para el votante en español.
Argumentos oficiales
Escritos por quienes apoyan y quienes se oponen, e impresos palabra por palabra en la guía oficial estatal para el votante. Los argumentos impresos en esta página son las opiniones de sus autores y ninguna agencia oficial ha verificado su exactitud.
Texto oficial en inglés. Lea la guía oficial para el votante en español (PDF).
Argumento a favor
De quienes apoyanFirmado por Michael Hedges, Shelley Huff, and Jennifer Yoder. Toque para leer.
YES ON PROP. 42: PROTECT YOUR RETIREMENT AND LIFE SAVINGS FROM STATE TAXES
California is now the third most expensive state to retire in the nation. Every year, higher costs and taxes make it harder to save. An April 2026 survey found 73% of Californians know someone who has had to delay retirement for financial reasons.
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION CURRENTLY ALLOWS DOUBLE TAXATION
Yet, California's Constitution currently allows the Legislature to tax the value of our personal property like retirement funds and savings accounts, even though residents already pay income tax on that money when they earn it. This means politicians can tax the same money twice: once when you earn it, and again when it is sitting in your retirement funds or savings accounts. That's double taxation!
In the last few years alone, the Legislature and special interests have introduced six separate proposals that would tax retirement and savings accounts.
Taxes and cost of living are already too high in California - we need protections against taxes on our personal property and retirement savings.
PROP. 42 PROHIBITS TAXES ON RETIREMENT AND SAVINGS
Prop. 42 amends the state Constitution to protect Californians from this double taxation by special interests and politicians. Specifically, the measure:
• Prohibits new taxes on personal property, such as retirement funds, pensions and savings accounts; • Prohibits retroactive taxes; and • Prohibits all new taxes on retirement and savings this year and in the future.
PROP. 42 PROTECTS ALL FORMS OF RETIREMENT FUNDS AND SAVINGS FROM NEW TAXES
Roughly 80% of Californians report having some form of retirement fund or savings, including young workers just beginning to save; teachers, firefighters and police officers with pensions; and retirees who depend on their savings for financial security.
This measure protects all forms of personal property from new taxes, including 401ks, pensions, IRAs and personal savings.
"Prop. 42 protects Californians' savings and retirement. Whether it's a union member's hard-earned pension or a small business owner's IRA, new taxes on retirement shouldn't stand between people and the security they've planned for." - Chris Hannan, President, State Building and Construction Trades Council of California representing hundreds of thousands of union construction trades workers.
PROP. 42 PROHIBITS UNFAIR RETROACTIVE TAXES
The state should not be able to pass new taxes that apply retroactively to money that taxpayers earned in the past. Prop. 42 requires any new taxes to apply only after voters have approved them.
"It's a question of fairness and common sense. People plan their retirement for years - they deserve stable, predictable rules that don't change after years of saving and planning. Prop. 42 provides that certainty." - Sean Morgan, licensed financial advisor
Prop. 42 is supported by a broad coalition of seniors, veterans, small business owners, blue-collar workers, retirees, including groups like the California Professional Firefighters and Disabled American Veterans, Dept. of California.
Californians are already struggling with high costs of living and high taxes. Many work their entire lives to achieve some measure of retirement security. It should be illegal for politicians and special interests to tax our retirement and savings.
You earned and saved it. Now we need to protect it. Please join us in voting Yes on 42. YesonProp42.org
Michael Hedges, President
California Small Business Association
Shelley Huff, Commander
AMVETS, Department of California
Jennifer Yoder, Board Member
California Senior Alliance
Respuesta al argumento a favor
De quienes se oponenFirmado por Suzanne Jimenez. Toque para leer.
THIS IS ANOTHER BILLIONAIRE-FUNDED TRICK
Don't be fooled - Prop. 42 is not really about protecting your retirement savings from new taxes.
It's a redundant, expensive trick to allow approximately 200 billionaires to keep avoiding paying their own taxes while YOU get stuck with the bill.
PROP. 42 WOULD CANCEL OUT THE BILLIONAIRE TAX
Prop. 42 is a billionaire-funded scheme designed specifically to undo the California Billionaire Tax, Prop. 40.
Prop. 42 was put on the ballot because billionaires don't want to pay their fair share. They'd rather millions of working people lose healthcare than pay a modest, one-time tax on their extreme wealth.
WHO'S BEHIND THIS? SOME OF DONALD TRUMP'S DONORS
The billionaires behind this don't care about protecting your retirement savings. They're protecting themselves. They've been getting out of paying their own taxes for years through loopholes and tax breaks.
This sham initiative was created to trick voters like you into making a billionaire tax impossible to enforce. That's why you must vote NO.
PROP. 40 WOULD ONLY TAX BILLIONAIRES' $2 TRILLION IN WEALTH
The billionaires behind Prop. 42 have spread lies about the California Billionaire Tax (Prop. 40), trying to trick voters into thinking that their retirement and savings are at risk.
Don't buy the fear-mongering. The California Billionaires Tax ONLY applies to billionaires. It's about making billionaires finally pay their fair share so we're not stuck with shuttered hospitals and skyrocketing healthcare costs.
Vote NO on Prop. 42.
Suzanne Jimenez, Chief of Staff
SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West
Argumento en contra
De quienes se oponenFirmado por Suzanne Jimenez. Toque para leer.
VOTE NO ON PROP. 42. This is a billionaire-funded initiative designed specifically to undo the California Billionaire Tax, Prop. 40.
PROP. 42 WOULD CANCEL OUT THE BILLIONAIRE TAX
Prop. 42 was put on the ballot for one reason - because billionaires don't want to pay their fair share. This initiative was created to trick voters like you into making a billionaire tax impossible to enforce. That's why you must vote NO.
Don't fall for the billionaires' lies. Prop. 42 isn't about preventing new taxes on personal property. It's about preventing one specific tax that billionaires want to avoid, because they'd rather millions of working people lose healthcare than pay a modest, one-time tax on their extreme wealth.
PROP. 42 WAS FUNDED BY BILLIONAIRES WHO WANT YOU TO PAY MORE FOR HEALTHCARE
One of Prop. 42's main funders is Google founder and Trump donor Sergey Brin, whose wealth has DOUBLED to nearly $300 billion since Trump's election. Now he's spent over $57 million to fund sham measures like Prop. 42 that attempt to cancel out a billionaire tax. U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders called this arrogant move by Brin "unacceptable."
Donald Trump took money out of working peoples' pockets and gave it to billionaires like Brin through massive tax breaks. Now, the billionaires backing Prop. 42 want YOU to pay more for your healthcare.
VOTE NO ON PROP. 42 IF YOU SUPPORT THE BILLIONAIRE TAX
We have a chance to make billionaires pay their fair share to keep hospitals open and healthcare affordable for California's working families. Vote NO on Prop. 42.
Suzanne Jimenez, Chief of Staff
SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West
Respuesta al argumento en contra
De quienes apoyanFirmado por Darrell Roberts, Chris Hannan, and Brian R. Marvel. Toque para leer.
WHO SUPPORTS PROP. 42
Prop. 42 is supported by hundreds of thousands of seniors, veterans, firefighters, blue-collar workers, public-safety officers and working families because it protects the retirement and savings of ALL Californians from new taxes. Who opposes 42? One organization that wants to tax retirement accounts.
WHY WE NEED PROP. 42
Sacramento politicians and special interests have repeatedly tried to pass taxes on retirement and personal savings accounts in recent years. They've relied on a loophole in California's Constitution that allows government to tax our income when we earn it, and AGAIN when it is simply sitting in our savings and retirement accounts.
CALIFORNIA IS EXPENSIVE ENOUGH WITHOUT DOUBLE TAXATION
Prop. 42 prohibits this double taxation by PROHIBITING ALL NEW TAXES ON RETIREMENT AND SAVINGS ACCOUNTS and other personal property, whether proposed by legislation or ballot measure, including proposals on this year's ballot and in the future.
It is a comprehensive constitutional protection against politicians or special interests trying to tax our retirement funds and savings accounts.
WHO BENEFITS FROM PROP. 42
Prop. 42 protects the retirement and savings for all Californians - young workers just beginning to save; teachers, firefighters and police officers with pensions; retirees and veterans who depend on their savings for financial security.
You saved it. You deserve to keep it.
Prop. 42 asks a simple question: should California politicians have the power to tax your personal property, including retirement and savings accounts?
If you think your retirement and savings should be protected from taxes, vote Yes on 42.
Darrell Roberts, President
California Professional Firefighters
Chris Hannan, President
State Building and Construction Trades Council of California
Brian R. Marvel, President
Peace Officers Research Association of California
Qué posición tienen los grupos
Todos los grupos de nuestra lista, por categoría. Cada posición enlaza a la guía publicada por el propio grupo.
Definiciones de las etiquetas Las citas son las propias palabras de cada grupo, copiadas exactamente.
Partidos políticos
10 grupos
Los partidos estatales y del condado son grupos separados y pueden tener posiciones distintas.
American Independent Party
Sin posición
American Independent Party Su guía, revisada el 15 de octubre de 2026California Democratic Party
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 42: Oppose"
California Democratic Party Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026California Republican Party
Sí
Sus palabras: "Prop 42: support"
California Republican Party Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Green Party of California
No
Sus palabras: "NO on Prop 42: Income Taxes on Retirement"
Green Party of California Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Green Party of LA County
Sin posición
Green Party of LA County Su guía, revisada el 15 de octubre de 2026LA County Democratic Party
No
Sus palabras: "STATEWIDE Prop 42 Prohibit New Taxes on Retirement Holdings, Personal Assets, and Savings and Limit Retroactive Taxes Initiative NO"
LA County Democratic Party Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA Hispanic Republican Club
Sin posición
LA Hispanic Republican Club Dónde buscamos (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)Libertarian Party of California
Sí
Sus palabras: "Ban New Personal Property Taxes & Certain Retroactive Taxes ✅ YES"
Libertarian Party of California Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Peace and Freedom Party
No
Sus palabras: "Vote NO on Propositions 41 and 42 | Placed on the ballot by billionaires, these measures would cancel the billionaires' tax even if proposition 40 passes."
Peace and Freedom Party Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Republican Party of LA County
Sí
Su herramienta muestra: Prop 42: YES
Republican Party of LA County Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026
Medios de noticias
5 grupos
Estos son los únicos medios de noticias que encontramos con respaldos publicados para esta elección. Sugiera otro.
Knock LA
No
Sus palabras: "State Measure 42: NO!"
Knock LA Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026La Opinión
Sí
Sus palabras: "Editorial: Sí a la Proposición 42 | Llamamos a los votantes de California a votar a favor de la Proposición 42."
La Opinión Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Daily News
Sí
Sus palabras: "Proposition 42: Yes"
Los Angeles Daily News Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Sentinel
Sí
Sus palabras: "Prop 42 | YES"
Los Angeles Sentinel Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Times
Sin posición
Los Angeles Times Dónde buscamos: la página de editoriales del LA Times (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)
Sindicatos
9 grupos
California Labor Federation
No
Sus palabras: "Prop 42: Prohibits New State Personal Property Taxes Recommend: OPPOSE"
California Labor Federation Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026California Teachers Association
Sin posición
California Teachers Association Su guía, revisada el 15 de octubre de 2026LA County Federation of Labor
No
Sus palabras: "Prop 42: Prohibits New State Personal Property Taxes - No"
LA County Federation of Labor Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA County Firefighters Local 1014
Sin posición
LA County Firefighters Local 1014 Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026LA/OC Building and Construction Trades Council
Sí
Sus palabras: "2026 NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION ENDORSEMENTS | PROP. 42 Retirement & Personal Savings Protection Act SUPPORT"
LA/OC Building and Construction Trades Council Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Police Protective League
Sin posición
Los Angeles Police Protective League Dónde buscamos (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)SEIU Local 721
Neutral
Sus palabras: "42 Prohibit New Taxes on Retirement Holdings, Personal Assets, and Savings and Limit Retroactive Taxes Initiative NEUTRAL"
SEIU Local 721 Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026UNITE HERE Local 11
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 42: Prohibits New State Personal Property Taxes | Recommend: NO"
UNITE HERE Local 11 Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA)
No
Sus palabras: "NO | Prop 42 | Keeps luxury assets tax-free for the wealthy"
United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026
Organizaciones empresariales
3 grupos
BizFed (LA County Business Federation)
Sin posición
BizFed (LA County Business Federation) Dónde buscamos (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)CalChamber
Sí
Sus palabras: "Proposition 42: Prohibits New State Personal Property Taxes and Certain Retroactive State Taxes (YES)"
CalChamber Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA Area Chamber of Commerce
Neutral
Sus palabras: "Prohibition on Taxes on Asset Ownership (Anti-Wealth Tax Constitutional Amendment) | Prevents new taxes on personal property. Designed to block Prop 40. | NEUTRAL"
LA Area Chamber of Commerce Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026
Grupos cívicos y de buen gobierno
1 grupo
League of Women Voters of California
No
Sus palabras: "Prop 42 would lock broad new restrictions on state taxing power into the California Constitution, limiting California's ability to respond to future needs."
League of Women Voters of California Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026
Grupos de causas y defensa
3 grupos
Abundant Housing LA
Sin posición
Abundant Housing LA Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026LA Forward
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 42 - Property Tax Ban to Stop Prop 40Oppose | Prop 40 would be undermined by two competing initiatives that we recommend voters oppose: Prop 41 to audit new tax spending and Prop 42"
LA Forward Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Sierra Club Angeles Chapter
Sin posición
Sierra Club Angeles Chapter Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026
Enlaces oficiales
Sobre el resumen
Resumen redactado con IA a partir del análisis oficial y comparado con él mediante revisión automática. Lea el análisis oficial