Propuesta 41: Límite de gastos del estado
PROHÍBE NUEVOS IMPUESTOS ESTATALES QUE EXCLUYAN SUS INGRESOS DEL LÍMITE DE GASTO ESTATAL. EXIGE AUDITORÍAS PARA LOS NUEVOS IMPUESTOS ESPECIALES ESTATALES.
Enmienda constitucional por iniciativa. Un cambio a la Constitución de California que los votantes pusieron en la boleta al firmar peticiones.
En palabras sencillas
Cuando los patrocinadores de una iniciativa de impuesto especial reúnan el 25 por ciento de las firmas necesarias, el Auditor del Estado revisaría los programas que ese impuesto financiaría. Los programas financiados con impuestos especiales nuevos o aumentados serían auditados cada cuatro años. El gasto de los nuevos impuestos especiales podría tener que contarse dentro del límite de gastos del estado. Las auditorías probablemente costarían unos pocos millones de dólares al año, y el costo crecería con el tiempo. En su mayor parte se pagaría con los nuevos impuestos. Imprimir los resúmenes de las auditorías en la guía para votantes agregaría unos cientos de miles de dólares en costos estatales de impresión y envío por cada iniciativa que califique. Podría haber ahorros si se usan los consejos de las auditorías y estos funcionan. El efecto neto se desconoce. Si la Propuesta 41 recibe más votos a favor que la Propuesta 40, los tribunales podrían encontrar un conflicto y bloquear la Propuesta 40.
UN VOTO POR SÍ SIGNIFICA
Cuando se propongan impuestos especiales mediante iniciativas ciudadanas, el auditor del estado de California revisará los programas financiados con dicho impuesto antes de que la iniciativa se someta a votación. El auditor del estado de California también revisaría periódicamente los programas financiados con impuestos especiales aprobados por los votantes o por la Asamblea Legislativa. Además, es posible que el estado no pueda excluir del límite de gasto ningún nuevo gasto fiscal especial.
UN VOTO POR NO SIGNIFICA
La responsabilidad del auditor del estado de California de supervisar los programas gubernamentales no cambiaría. Los requisitos relativos al límite de gasto público no cambiarían.
Texto oficial en español de la Guía Oficial de Información para el Votante de California.
Fuente: guía oficial para el votanteRótulo oficial de la boleta
Las palabras exactas de su boleta. Toque para leer.
PROHIBITS NEW STATE TAXES THAT EXCLUDE REVENUES FROM STATE SPENDING LIMIT. REQUIRES AUDITS FOR NEW STATE SPECIAL TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Nullifies state taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that exempt their revenues from voter-approved state spending limit. Requires pre-election and recurring audits of programs funded by new special taxes. Fiscal Impact: The net fiscal effect is unknown as it depends on future decisions by voters, the Legislature, and other policymakers.
Fuente: Registro de Votantes del Condado de Los Ángeles, medidas en la boleta
Texto oficial en inglés. Lea la guía oficial para el votante en español.
Argumentos oficiales
Escritos por quienes apoyan y quienes se oponen, e impresos palabra por palabra en la guía oficial estatal para el votante. Los argumentos impresos en esta página son las opiniones de sus autores y ninguna agencia oficial ha verificado su exactitud.
Texto oficial en inglés. Lea la guía oficial para el votante en español (PDF).
Argumento a favor
De quienes apoyanFirmado por Denise LeDuc Froemming, Tom Hayes, and Robert Gutierrez. Toque para leer.
CALIFORNIANS DESERVE BETTER RESULTS FOR OUR TAX DOLLARS
Prop. 41 requires the State Auditor to conduct independent public audits of programs funded by proposed new taxes in order to increase transparency and accountability and drive better outcomes.
Californians pay some of the highest taxes in the country - on top of our high cost of living. This year alone, California's state government will spend more than $350 billion - a 79% increase in spending since 2019. Billions of our tax dollars have flowed into state programs like homelessness efforts, with too little to show for it.
We deserve better education, health care, infrastructure and other services in return for the hard-earned money we pay to the state.
Prop. 41 requires more accountability, transparency and trackable progress of programs funded by our taxes, so that we stop funding failure and start funding successful outcomes.
Here's how Prop. 41 works.
PUBLIC AUDITS TO PROVIDE ACCOUNTABILITY, TRANSPARENCY AND OVERSIGHT
Prop. 41 requires the independent State Auditor to conduct performance and financial audits of the programs funded by new tax measures, with the results posted publicly. The audits must:
• Track all program spending and assess whether it's achieving its intended outcomes; • Determine whether programs have sufficient oversight and accountability; • Identify areas of waste, fraud and abuse; • Recommend how future waste and fraud can be avoided and programs made more effective.
Prop. 41 requires audits both before taxes are voted on to provide transparency to voters, and ongoing audits of programs funded by approved taxes to ensure accountability. PROP. 41: INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC INFORMATION FOR VOTERS ON PROPOSED TAXES
Before we vote on new taxes to fund programs, voters should have access to independent information about how those programs are being managed and whether they actually need more funding. Under Prop. 41, the Auditor's findings must be posted publicly and in the Voter Information Guide - so voters can make informed decisions about new taxes without having to rely on information from special interests or politicians.
"This commonsense, long overdue reform will finally instill some transparency and accountability in state spending - ensuring Californians get better government services for the taxes we pay. It provides an independent, public report card for government spending, so government programs work better for everyone." - Pat Fong Kushida, President/CEO of the CalAsian Chamber of Commerce
PROP. 41: A BETTER DEAL FOR TAXPAYERS
Prop. 41 doesn't raise taxes - it protects taxpayers' interests:
• Reduces the waste and fraud that have cost California taxpayers billions of dollars in recent years; • Requires all taxes to comply with the state's voter-approved spending limit - including its requirement that excess revenues get refunded to taxpayers.
Prop. 41 ensures taxpayers get better results - not just a bigger tax bill.
"Every tax dollar we waste is a dollar that could actually help someone. Californians already pay the highest state income and sales taxes in the country - we need better transparency and accountability to make sure our tax dollars produce results. Prop. 41 delivers." - Steve Westly, former Controller of California.
Please join good government groups, small business owners, accountants, taxpayers and public transparency advocates in voting Yes on 41.
For more information, visit: www.ResultsCA.org
Denise LeDuc Froemming, CPA, President
California Society of Certified Public Accountants (CalCPAs)
Tom Hayes, Fmr. California State Auditor
Robert Gutierrez, President
California Taxpayers Association (CalTax)
Respuesta al argumento a favor
De quienes se oponenFirmado por Suzanne Jimenez. Toque para leer.
THIS IS A BILLIONAIRE-FUNDED SMOKE SCREEN
Don't be fooled - Prop. 41 is not really about audits. This is all a trick so approximately 200 billionaires can keep avoiding paying their own taxes while YOU get stuck with the bill.
PROP. 41 WOULD CANCEL OUT THE BILLIONAIRE TAX
Prop. 41 is a billionaire-funded scheme designed specifically to undo the California Billionaire Tax, Prop. 40.
Prop. 41 was put on the ballot because billionaires don't want to pay their fair share. They'd rather millions of working people lose healthcare than pay a modest, one-time tax on their extreme wealth.
To add insult to injury, Prop. 41 isn't just a scheme, it's an expensive one - it would cost the state time and money. SOME OF DONALD TRUMP'S DONORS FUNDED THIS
The billionaires behind this don't care about accountability for taxpayers. They've been getting out of paying their own taxes for years through loopholes and tax breaks.
This sham initiative was created to trick voters like you into making a billionaire tax impossible to enforce.
IF YOU CARE ABOUT FUNDING FOR HEALTHCARE, PUBLIC EDUCATION, AND FOOD ASSISTANCE, VOTE NO ON PROP. 41
Donald Trump slashed funding for our essential services so billionaires could hoard even more wealth.
Passing the California Billionaire Tax is the only way to replace the money Trump took from us, so we're not stuck with shuttered hospitals and skyrocketing healthcare costs.
To save lives and keep healthcare costs down for Californians, reject the billionaires' lies.
Vote NO on Prop. 41.
Suzanne Jimenez, Chief of Staff
SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West
Argumento en contra
De quienes se oponenFirmado por Suzanne Jimenez. Toque para leer.
VOTE NO ON PROP. 41. This is a billionaire-funded initiative designed specifically to undo the California Billionaire Tax, Prop. 40.
PROP. 41 WOULD CANCEL OUT THE BILLIONAIRE TAX
Prop. 41 was put on the ballot for one reason - because billionaires don't want to pay their fair share. This initiative was created to trick voters like you into making a billionaire tax impossible to enforce. That's why you must vote NO.
Don't fall for the billionaires' lies. Prop. 41 isn't about auditing new taxes. It's about defeating one specific tax that billionaires want to avoid, because they'd rather millions of working people lose healthcare than pay a modest, one-time tax on their extreme wealth.
PROP. 41 WAS FUNDED BY BILLIONAIRES WHO WANT YOU TO PAY MORE FOR HEALTHCARE
One of Prop. 41's main funders is Google founder and Trump donor Sergey Brin, whose wealth has DOUBLED to nearly $300 billion since Trump's election. Now he's spent over $57 million to fund sham measures like Prop. 41 that attempt to cancel out a billionaire tax. U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders called this arrogant move by Brin "unacceptable."
Donald Trump took money out of working peoples' pockets and gave it to billionaires like Brin through massive tax breaks. Now, the billionaires backing Prop. 41 want YOU to pay more for your healthcare.
VOTE NO ON PROP. 41 IF YOU SUPPORT THE BILLIONAIRE TAX
We have a chance to make billionaires pay their fair share to keep hospitals open and healthcare affordable for California's working families. Vote NO on Prop. 41.
Suzanne Jimenez, Chief of Staff
SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West
Respuesta al argumento en contra
De quienes apoyanFirmado por Pat Fong Kushida, Steve Westly, and Robert Gutierrez. Toque para leer.
When state government programs don't deliver, it hurts the people who rely on those services and the taxpayers who fund them.
Prop. 41 requires the independent State Auditor to conduct performance and financial audits of the programs to be funded by new taxes - to help make programs more effective and efficient.
Ask yourself: why would a single, solitary Sacramento special interest oppose transparency and accountability?
YES ON 41: TAXPAYERS DESERVE BETTER RESULTS
Some facts:
• Our state budget is a record high $352 billion this year. • State spending is up 79% since 2019. • We've spent billions on programs like homelessness - with too little to show for it.
With some of the highest taxes in the nation and a rising cost of living, we can't afford to fund failure. Every dollar wasted is one that could go to help someone.
Prop. 41 requires transparency and trackable progress of programs, to help improve education, health care and other public services Californians rely on.
PROP. 41: PUBLIC AUDITS TO IMPROVE ACCOUNTABILITY
"Independent performance audits give voters objective, credible information about public resources, strengthening accountability and public trust." Denise LeDuc Froemming, President, California Society of Certified Public Accountants
Under Prop. 41, the independent State Auditor publicly reviews the programs that new taxes would fund, exposes any waste or mismanagement, and recommends program improvements. The audit findings are published in the Voter Information Guide before you vote - with ongoing audits if a tax is approved.
VOTERS DESERVE MORE TRANSPARENCY - even if special interests don't like it.
Vote Yes on Prop. 41. More transparency, more accountability, better results for our tax dollars.
Pat Fong Kushida, President
California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce (CalAsian Chamber)
Steve Westly, Fmr. California State Controller
Robert Gutierrez, President
California Taxpayers Association (CalTax)
Qué posición tienen los grupos
Todos los grupos de nuestra lista, por categoría. Cada posición enlaza a la guía publicada por el propio grupo.
Definiciones de las etiquetas Las citas son las propias palabras de cada grupo, copiadas exactamente.
Partidos políticos
10 grupos
Los partidos estatales y del condado son grupos separados y pueden tener posiciones distintas.
American Independent Party
Sin posición
American Independent Party Su guía, revisada el 15 de octubre de 2026California Democratic Party
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 41: Oppose"
California Democratic Party Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026California Republican Party
Sí
Sus palabras: "Prop 41: Support"
California Republican Party Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Green Party of California
No
Sus palabras: "NO on Prop 41: Tax Administration"
Green Party of California Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Green Party of LA County
Sin posición
Green Party of LA County Su guía, revisada el 15 de octubre de 2026LA County Democratic Party
No
Sus palabras: "STATEWIDE Prop 41 Prohibit Excluding New State Taxes from Spending Limit and Require Special Tax Audits Initiative NO"
LA County Democratic Party Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA Hispanic Republican Club
Sin posición
LA Hispanic Republican Club Dónde buscamos (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)Libertarian Party of California
Sí
Sus palabras: "Audits of New State Special Taxes ✅ YES"
Libertarian Party of California Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Peace and Freedom Party
No
Sus palabras: "Vote NO on Propositions 41 and 42 | Placed on the ballot by billionaires, these measures would cancel the billionaires' tax even if proposition 40 passes."
Peace and Freedom Party Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Republican Party of LA County
Sí
Su herramienta muestra: Prop 41: YES
Republican Party of LA County Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026
Medios de noticias
5 grupos
Estos son los únicos medios de noticias que encontramos con respaldos publicados para esta elección. Sugiera otro.
Knock LA
No
Sus palabras: "State Measure 41: NO!"
Knock LA Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026La Opinión
Sí
Sus palabras: "La Opinión apoya la Proposición 41 y llama a sus lectores a votar a favor de ambas en los comicios que culminarán el 3 de noviembre."
La Opinión Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Daily News
Sí
Sus palabras: "Proposition 41: Yes"
Los Angeles Daily News Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Sentinel
Sí
Sus palabras: "Prop 41 | YES"
Los Angeles Sentinel Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Times
Sin posición
Los Angeles Times Dónde buscamos: la página de editoriales del LA Times (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)
Sindicatos
9 grupos
California Labor Federation
No
Sus palabras: "Prop 41: Requires Audits for New State Special Taxes Recommend: OPPOSE"
California Labor Federation Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026California Teachers Association
Sin posición
California Teachers Association Su guía, revisada el 15 de octubre de 2026LA County Federation of Labor
No
Sus palabras: "Prop 41: Requires Audits for New State Special Taxes - No"
LA County Federation of Labor Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA County Firefighters Local 1014
Sin posición
LA County Firefighters Local 1014 Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026LA/OC Building and Construction Trades Council
Sin posición
LA/OC Building and Construction Trades Council Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Police Protective League
Sin posición
Los Angeles Police Protective League Dónde buscamos (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)SEIU Local 721
Neutral
Sus palabras: "41 Prohibit Excluding New State Taxes from Spending Limit and Require Special Tax Audits Initiative NEUTRAL"
SEIU Local 721 Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026UNITE HERE Local 11
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 41: Requires Audits for New State Special Taxes | Recommend: NO"
UNITE HERE Local 11 Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA)
No
Sus palabras: "NO | Prop 41 | Tax audit requirements"
United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026
Organizaciones empresariales
3 grupos
BizFed (LA County Business Federation)
Sin posición
BizFed (LA County Business Federation) Dónde buscamos (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)CalChamber
Sí
Sus palabras: "Proposition 41: Prohibits New State Taxes That Exclude Revenues from State Spending Limit. Requires Audits for New State Special Taxes (YES)"
CalChamber Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA Area Chamber of Commerce
Sí
Sus palabras: "Mandatory Audits of Programs Funded by New State Special Taxes | Requires state audits of programs funded by new special taxes before going to voters. Designed to block Prop 40. | SUPPORT"
LA Area Chamber of Commerce Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026
Grupos cívicos y de buen gobierno
1 grupo
League of Women Voters of California
No
Sus palabras: "Prop 41 would put revenue from new state taxes under the Gann Limit's rigid constitutional spending cap, making it harder to fund essential services and respond to changing needs."
League of Women Voters of California Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026
Grupos de causas y defensa
3 grupos
Abundant Housing LA
Sin posición
Abundant Housing LA Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026LA Forward
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 41 - Retroactive Tax Ban to Stop Prop 40Oppose | Prop 40 would be undermined by two competing initiatives that we recommend voters oppose: Prop 41 to audit new tax spending and Prop 42"
LA Forward Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Sierra Club Angeles Chapter
Sin posición
Sierra Club Angeles Chapter Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026
Enlaces oficiales
Sobre el resumen
Resumen redactado con IA a partir del análisis oficial y comparado con él mediante revisión automática. Lea el análisis oficial