Propuesta 40: Impuesto único a los multimillonarios
Impone un impuesto por única vez a ciertos contribuyentes
Enmienda constitucional y ley por iniciativa. Un cambio a la Constitución de California y a la ley estatal que los votantes pusieron en la boleta al firmar peticiones.
En palabras sencillas
La Propuesta 40 cobraría un impuesto único a los multimillonarios que vivían en California el 1 de enero de 2026. El impuesto sería del 5 por ciento del patrimonio neto (los bienes menos las deudas). Por lo general, los bienes raíces, las pensiones y las cuentas de jubilación no contarían. El noventa por ciento de los ingresos debe destinarse a la atención médica. El resto debe destinarse a la educación, la asistencia alimentaria y la administración del impuesto. Los límites de gasto y las reglas de financiamiento escolar no se aplicarían a este dinero del impuesto. Es probable que el estado recaude decenas de miles de millones de dólares durante varios años. Administrar el impuesto podría costar decenas de millones de dólares al año. Es posible que algunos multimillonarios reduzcan sus pagos del impuesto sobre la renta, por ejemplo, al irse de California. Eso podría reducir los ingresos del impuesto estatal sobre la renta en menos de $1 mil millones al año.
UN VOTO POR SÍ SIGNIFICA
El estado recaudaría un impuesto por única vez a los multimillonarios equivalente al 5 % de su patrimonio.
UN VOTO POR NO SIGNIFICA
El estado no recaudaría un impuesto por única vez a los multimillonarios equivalente al 5 % de su patrimonio.
Texto oficial en español de la Guía Oficial de Información para el Votante de California.
Fuente: guía oficial para el votanteRótulo oficial de la boleta
Las palabras exactas de su boleta. Toque para leer.
IMPOSES ONE-TIME TAX ON CERTAIN TAXPAYERS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE. Imposes 5% tax on certain taxpayers with assets over $1 billion; revenue primarily for health care. Exempts revenues from constitutional requirements for school funding and spending limit. Fiscal Impact: Temporary revenue increase of tens of billions of dollars spread over several years from wealth tax on billionaires. Possible ongoing decrease of less than $1 billion per year in income tax revenue from billionaires.
Fuente: Registro de Votantes del Condado de Los Ángeles, medidas en la boleta
Texto oficial en inglés. Lea la guía oficial para el votante en español.
Argumentos oficiales
Escritos por quienes apoyan y quienes se oponen, e impresos palabra por palabra en la guía oficial estatal para el votante. Los argumentos impresos en esta página son las opiniones de sus autores y ninguna agencia oficial ha verificado su exactitud.
Texto oficial en inglés. Lea la guía oficial para el votante en español (PDF).
Argumento a favor
De quienes apoyanFirmado por Suzanne Jimenez, Victoria Barron, and Denise Robb. Toque para leer.
YES ON PROP. 40 TO TAX BILLIONAIRES
Trump's "Big, Ugly Bill" slashed funding for healthcare in California to pay for more billionaire tax breaks, eliminating coverage for over a million Californians and doubling health insurance premiums for millions more. Vote YES on Prop. 40 to make billionaires finally pay their fair share in taxes and stop sticking the middle class with the bill.
FUND HEALTHCARE, NOT BILLIONAIRE TAX BREAKS
Prop. 40 makes approximately 200 California billionaires pay a modest, one-time tax on their global wealth to keep local hospitals and ERs open and healthcare affordable for millions of Californians.
It will raise about $100 billion to replace the funding Trump and his billionaire donors took from working people to line their pockets. The funds will go to life-saving medical care for seniors, veterans, and families. It will allow millions of Californians to keep their health insurance and not see their premiums skyrocket. It will prevent mass teacher layoffs in our public schools and keep children fed through food assistance programs.
BILLIONAIRES SHOULD PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE
You pay your taxes out of every paycheck, but billionaires pay much lower rates than working families. They insist on paying less, even as they get bigger and bigger tax breaks.
Prop. 40 enacts a one-time tax paid ONLY by Californians worth more than $1 billion, a small group of people who together hold $2 trillion in wealth - most of which will never be taxed due to loopholes that favor the ultra-wealthy.
Billionaires amassed their extreme wealth on the backs of the middle class, and we have a chance to make them pay their fair share so WE aren't stuck paying more for healthcare.
BERNIE SANDERS SUPPORTS PROP. 40
U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders strongly supports voting YES on Prop. 40, even if some politicians in Sacramento are protecting billionaires over working people.
"The idea that [billionaires] are saying it's ok for children to die, for people not to get the healthcare they need, that they're going to punish the people of California - it's outrageous."
- U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders.
DON'T BELIEVE THE BILLIONAIRES' LIES
A small group of morally bankrupt billionaires is spreading lies about Prop. 40, because they want working people to foot the bill for their tax breaks.
Google founder and Trump donor Sergey Brin's wealth has DOUBLED to nearly $300 billion since Trump's election. Now he's spent over $57 million to oppose Prop. 40. He'd rather millions of Californians lose healthcare than pay his fair share in taxes.
Billionaires like Brin have bought and paid for some corrupt politicians and organizational leaders to also oppose Prop. 40 - but actual teachers, Planned Parenthood workers, nurses, and union members support it. Those opposing Prop. 40 have not put forth any viable solution to replacing the funding Trump took from us.
Of course these billionaires and their puppets don't want a billionaire tax, but you should - because someone has to pay, and working people are already paying enough for healthcare.
SAVE LIVES. TAX BILLIONAIRES.
Suzanne Jimenez, Chief of Staff
SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West
Victoria Barron, Patient Access Specialist
Planned Parenthood of Pacific Southwest
Denise Robb, Ph.D., Member of American Federation of Teachers
Local 1521
Los Angeles College Faculty Guild
Respuesta al argumento a favor
De quienes se oponenFirmado por April O'Connor, Rob Gutierrez, and Chris Hannan. Toque para leer.
CALIFORNIA'S EDUCATION, HEALTHCARE, PUBLIC SAFETY, LABOR AND BUSINESS LEADERS ALL OPPOSE PROP. 40's FLAWED TAX SCHEME
Prop. 40 is a flawed tax scheme that will damage our state while taxpayers pay the price.
Here's why a broad coalition of California teachers, doctors, clinics, hospitals, firefighters, taxpayers, blue-collar labor unions, businesses, Democrats and Republicans oppose 40:
- Prop. 40 won't fill any funding gap - IT WILL COST CALIFORNIA $25 BILLION in lost revenue for schools, healthcare and public safety.
- Prop. 40 won't fix healthcare or lower costs for consumers - it's a blank check that ALLOWS THE LEGISLATURE TO GIVE BILLIONS TO HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES, with no guarantees struggling families see a single cent to help them with high healthcare costs.
- Prop. 40 won't help schools: it exempts itself from California's voter-approved protections for school funding. That SHORTCHANGES PUBLIC SCHOOLS $3 BILLION ANNUALLY.
- Prop. 40 doesn't solve inequality in California. It just pushes out the companies and successful residents who drive California's economy, jobs and tax base - FORCING OTHER TAXPAYERS TO MAKE UP THE DIFFERENCE.
There's more: the French economists and the lone group behind Prop. 40 knew the money from their flawed one-time tax would run out, so they included a loophole that lets the Legislature expand the tax without a vote of the people.
Prop. 40 has no accountability or oversight, and no safeguards to ensure the money is spent as intended.
California needs stable, accountable revenue to fund our schools, healthcare and public safety - NOT PROP. 40.
Get the facts and vote no on Prop. 40.
April O'Connor, Teacher
California Teachers Association
Rob Gutierrez, President
California Taxpayers Association (CalTax)
Chris Hannan, President
State Building and Construction Trades Council of California
Argumento en contra
De quienes se oponenFirmado por René Bravo, Francisco Silva, and Dr. Debra Schade. Toque para leer.
No on 40 - FLAWED WEALTH TAX "EXPERIMENT" HURTS ALL CALIFORNIANS
Prop. 40 is a poorly designed tax scheme that will damage our economy and cost our state budget billions of dollars - without doing anything to lower healthcare costs for Californians.
This measure is a one-time tax that only provides temporary funds. When the money runs out, the politicians will be back with yet another tax.
PROP. 40 WILL COST CALIFORNIA $25 BILLION IN LOST REVENUE FOR HEALTHCARE, EDUCATION
A study by Stanford University economists found the tax will cost California $25 billion as the tax drives companies and wealthy residents out-of-state.
These residents create new businesses, drive our economic growth and already pay nearly half the income taxes that fund state programs. If they leave, it will create a huge hole in our budget, threatening core services like education, healthcare and public safety or forcing other taxpayers to make up the difference.
California's DOCTORS, HOSPITALS AND CLINICS OPPOSE PROP. 40 because the lost funding will endanger patients' access to healthcare. "Prop. 40 doesn't help the need for stable healthcare funding.
Prop. 40 makes it worse." - Jodi Hicks, President and CEO, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California
PROP. 40 IS WRITTEN TO GIVE POLITICIANS NEW POWER TO EXPAND THE TAX
Prop. 40 isn't just a "billionaire tax." The special interests behind the measure wrote it to give the State Legislature power to amend the measure - without voter approval.
Independent legal analysis found Prop. 40 opens the door to expanding the tax to the assets of ALL Californians - to your savings, home equity and even retirement funds. www.ReadltForYourself.org
PROP. 40 TAXES RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS FOR THE FIRST TIME
Prop. 40 would be the first in California history to tax retirement accounts - a dangerous precedent. If it passes, it will inevitably be expanded to tax more Californians' retirement savings.
PROP. 40 IS A RECIPE FOR MORE WASTEFUL SPENDING
State government spending is up 79% since 2019, without delivering better results on key issues like crime, housing and homelessness. But Prop. 40 includes no accountability, transparency or oversight provisions to ensure funds are spent as intended.
Instead, Prop. 40: • Exempts itself from voter-approved constitutional protections for schools, shortchanging classrooms over $3 billion annually. www.ProtectCaliforniaSchools.org • Exempts itself from the voter-approved state spending limit, including its requirement that excess revenues get returned to taxpayers. • Includes no safeguards to prevent billions from going directly to health insurance companies and CEOs.
AUTHORS ADMIT THE ONE-TIME TAX IS AN EXPERIMENT
The French economists who co-authored Prop. 40 have unsuccessfully proposed wealth taxes in France and the European Union that were rejected due to economic concerns. They call Prop. 40 "an experiment" that may backfire but say "California is the ideal place to test their idea."
We shouldn't risk California's future on a costly economic experiment. www.WhoWroteProp40.org
PROP. 40 IS OPPOSED BY LABOR AND BUSINESS, DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS, TEACHERS AND FIREFIGHTERS
Prop. 40 is opposed by Governor Gavin Newsom, the Democratic and Republican candidates for governor, and the following organizations: California Teachers Association, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, California Children's Hospital Association, State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, California Conference of Carpenters, California Professional Firefighters, California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce, California Council for Affordable Housing, California Taxpayers Association, California Chamber of Commerce, California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce
Join us and vote no on this flawed tax scheme.
Visit www.VoteNoOn40.org for more information.
René Bravo, M.D., President
California Medical Association
Francisco Silva, CEO
California Primary Care Association
Dr. Debra Schade, President
California School Boards Association
Respuesta al argumento en contra
De quienes apoyanFirmado por Suzanne Jimenez, Victoria Barron, and Denise Robb. Toque para leer.
LET'S CHECK THE FACTS
1. Prop. 40 is a BILLIONAIRE tax. It cannot be applied to anyone else - working people already pay more than their fair share.
2. Prop. 40 will GENERATE $100 billion to replace the healthcare funding Trump cut to fund billionaire tax breaks.
3. Billionaires pay MUCH LOWER TAX RATES compared to what working families pay out of every paycheck. DON'T LISTEN TO BILLIONAIRE LIES
The billionaires who helped Trump pass the "Big, Beautiful Bill" have spent millions to trick you into voting against a billionaire tax.
Don't be fooled. The endorsements and studies from the billionaires are hiding the truth - they're pushing a Trump agenda that protects billionaires and hurts everyday taxpayers.
ACTUAL DOCTORS, NURSES, TEACHERS, AND WORKERS SUPPORT PROP. 40
While some organizational leaders and lobbyists have sided with billionaires, the working people they're supposed to represent are standing behind Prop. 40 and urging you to vote YES. Supporters include:
California Nurses Association, Representative Ro Khanna, Doctors with the Committee of Interns and Residents, SEIU, California League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice (CLUE)
OPPONENTS OF PROP. 40 HAVE NO PLAN TO SAVE YOUR HEALTHCARE
The billionaires and their puppets have not put forth ANY viable solution to replacing the healthcare funding Trump took from us. They'd rather the middle class get stuck with shuttered hospitals and skyrocketing healthcare costs than pay their fair share.
Vote YES on Prop. 40.
Suzanne Jimenez, Chief of Staff
SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West
Victoria Barron, Patient Access Specialist
Planned Parenthood of Pacific Southwest
Denise Robb, Ph.D., Member of American Federation of Teachers
Local 1521
Los Angeles College Faculty Guild
Qué posición tienen los grupos
Todos los grupos de nuestra lista, por categoría. Cada posición enlaza a la guía publicada por el propio grupo.
Definiciones de las etiquetas Las citas son las propias palabras de cada grupo, copiadas exactamente.
Partidos políticos
10 grupos
Los partidos estatales y del condado son grupos separados y pueden tener posiciones distintas.
American Independent Party
No
Sus palabras: "Vote No on 40!"
American Independent Party Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026California Democratic Party
Sí
Sus palabras: "Proposition 40: Support"
California Democratic Party Fuente, revisado el 6 de oct. de 2026California Republican Party
No
Sus palabras: "Prop 40: oppose"
California Republican Party Fuente, revisado el 6 de oct. de 2026Green Party of California
Sí
Sus palabras: "YES on Prop 40: Billionaires Wealth Tax."
Green Party of California Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Green Party of LA County
Sí
Sus palabras: "Endorse - Proposition 40 - Billionaires Tax"
Green Party of LA County Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA County Democratic Party
Sí
Sus palabras: "Prop 40 | One-Time Wealth Tax for State-Funded Healthcare, Education, and Food Assistance Programs Initiative | YES"
LA County Democratic Party Fuente, revisado el 6 de oct. de 2026LA Hispanic Republican Club
Sin posición
LA Hispanic Republican Club Dónde buscamos (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)Libertarian Party of California
No
Sus palabras: "One-Time Tax on Certain Individuals & Trusts ❌ NO"
Libertarian Party of California Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Peace and Freedom Party
Sí
Sus palabras: "Vote YES on Propositions 3 and 40! | Prop 40 would levy a one-time 5% tax on the accumulated wealth of billionaires in California"
Peace and Freedom Party Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Republican Party of LA County
No
Su herramienta muestra: Prop 40: NO
Republican Party of LA County Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026
Medios de noticias
5 grupos
Estos son los únicos medios de noticias que encontramos con respaldos publicados para esta elección. Sugiera otro.
Knock LA
Sí
Sus palabras: "State Measure 40: YES!"
Knock LA Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026La Opinión
No
Sus palabras: "Editorial: la Proposición 40 sería buena a nivel nacional. Solo para California, es una mala idea | En contra, deberían estar los votantes. | La proposición 40 es una mala idea."
La Opinión Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Daily News
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 40: No"
Los Angeles Daily News Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Sentinel
No
Sus palabras: "Prop 40 | NO"
Los Angeles Sentinel Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Times
No
Sus palabras: "Times Editorial | Vote no on Prop. 40. It ignores education, housing and safety | Vote no on Proposition 40."
Los Angeles Times Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026
Sindicatos
9 grupos
California Labor Federation
Sí
Sus palabras: "Prop 40: Billionaire Wealth Tax Initiative Recommend: SUPPORT"
California Labor Federation Fuente, revisado el 6 de oct. de 2026California Teachers Association
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 40 - Billionaire Tax Act Oppose"
California Teachers Association Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA County Federation of Labor
Sí
Sus palabras: "Prop 40: Billionaire Wealth Tax Initiative - Yes"
LA County Federation of Labor Fuente, revisado el 15 de oct. de 2026LA County Firefighters Local 1014
Sin posición
LA County Firefighters Local 1014 Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026LA/OC Building and Construction Trades Council
No
Sus palabras: "2026 NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION ENDORSEMENTS | PROP. 40 Billionaire Tax OPPOSE"
LA/OC Building and Construction Trades Council Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Los Angeles Police Protective League
Sin posición
Los Angeles Police Protective League Dónde buscamos (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)SEIU Local 721
Neutral
Sus palabras: "40 One-Time Wealth Tax for State-Funded Healthcare, Education, and Food Assistance Programs Initiative NEUTRAL"
SEIU Local 721 Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026UNITE HERE Local 11
Sí
Sus palabras: "Proposition 40: Billionaire Wealth Tax Initiative | Recommend: YES"
UNITE HERE Local 11 Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA)
Sí
Sus palabras: "YES | Prop 40 | Billionaires tax to protect healthcare"
United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026
Organizaciones empresariales
3 grupos
BizFed (LA County Business Federation)
Sin posición
BizFed (LA County Business Federation) Dónde buscamos (revisión: 18 de oct. de 2026)CalChamber
No
Sus palabras: "Proposition 40: Imposes One-Time Tax on Certain Taxpayers (NO)"
CalChamber Fuente, revisado el 6 de oct. de 2026LA Area Chamber of Commerce
No
Sus palabras: "Billionaire Tax | Establishes a one-time 5% billionaire tax to fund healthcare, food assistance, and other public services. | OPPOSE"
LA Area Chamber of Commerce Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026
Grupos cívicos y de buen gobierno
1 grupo
League of Women Voters of California
Neutral
Sus palabras: "Because we have strong positions on both sides of this measure, the League takes a neutral position on Prop 40."
League of Women Voters of California Fuente, revisado el 6 de oct. de 2026
Grupos de causas y defensa
3 grupos
Abundant Housing LA
Sin posición
Abundant Housing LA Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026LA Forward
Sí
Sus palabras: "Proposition 40 - Billionaire taxSupport"
LA Forward Fuente, revisado el 18 de oct. de 2026Sierra Club Angeles Chapter
Sin posición
Sierra Club Angeles Chapter Su guía, revisada el 18 de oct. de 2026
Enlaces oficiales
Sobre el resumen
Resumen redactado con IA a partir del análisis oficial y comparado con él mediante revisión automática. Lea el análisis oficial