Volver a la boleta

Propuesta 3: Tasas de impuestos para ingresos altos

PROPORCIONA FINANCIAMIENTO PERMANENTE PARA LAS ESCUELAS Y LA ATENCIÓN MÉDICA EXTENDIENDO EL IMPUESTO EXISTENTE SOBRE LOS INGRESOS ALTOS

Enmienda constitucional por iniciativa. Un cambio a la Constitución de California que los votantes pusieron en la boleta al firmar peticiones.

En palabras sencillas

Se aplican tasas más altas del impuesto estatal sobre los ingresos a las personas con ingresos altos. Los votantes las aprobaron en 2012 y las extendieron en 2016. Están programadas para vencer en 2031. La Propuesta 3 las haría permanentes. Las tasas más altas se aplican a los ingresos superiores a unos $371,000 para quienes declaran impuestos de forma individual. Van de 10.3 por ciento a 12.3 por ciento, en comparación con 9.3 por ciento si se rechaza la medida. Lo paga el 2 por ciento de los contribuyentes en la parte más alta de la escala. El estado recibiría entre $5 mil millones y $15 mil millones al año, según el desempeño del mercado de valores. Aproximadamente el 40 por ciento iría a las escuelas y a los colegios comunitarios. El resto iría a otros programas estatales, y una parte iría a las reservas del presupuesto.

UN VOTO POR SÍ SIGNIFICA

El aumento del impuesto sobre la renta para las personas con ingresos altos, vigente desde 2012, pasaría a ser permanente en lugar de expirar en 2031.

UN VOTO POR NO SIGNIFICA

El aumento del impuesto sobre la renta para las personas con ingresos altos, vigente desde 2012, expiraría en 2031.

Texto oficial en español de la Guía Oficial de Información para el Votante de California.

Fuente: guía oficial para el votante

Rótulo oficial de la boleta

Las palabras exactas de su boleta. Toque para leer.
PROVIDES PERMANENT FUNDING FOR SCHOOLS AND HEALTH CARE BY EXTENDING EXISTING TAX ON HIGH INCOMES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Makes permanent existing voter-approved tax rates for individuals earning over $371,000 (adjusted annually for inflation). Allocates tax revenues to public education. Fiscal Impact: Maintains $5 billion to $15 billion of annual state income tax revenue by making a temporary tax increase on high-income earners permanent instead of letting it expire in 2031.
Fuente: Registro de Votantes del Condado de Los Ángeles, medidas en la boleta

Texto oficial en inglés. Lea la guía oficial para el votante en español.

Argumentos oficiales

Escritos por quienes apoyan y quienes se oponen, e impresos palabra por palabra en la guía oficial estatal para el votante. Los argumentos impresos en esta página son las opiniones de sus autores y ninguna agencia oficial ha verificado su exactitud.

Texto oficial en inglés. Lea la guía oficial para el votante en español (PDF).

Argumento a favor

De quienes apoyanFirmado por David Goldberg, Katie Nilsson, and Jodi Hicks. Toque para leer.

PROPOSITION 3 PROTECTS OUR SCHOOLS, HEALTHCARE AND OUR COMMUNITIES WITHOUT RAISING YOUR TAXES.

Proposition 3 is NOT a new tax and does NOT raise taxes on anyone. Prop. 3 prevents millionaires and billionaires from getting a tax cut, and requires strict accountability and audits to ensure school funding gets to classrooms.

PROP. 3 PREVENTS BILLIONS IN CUTS TO OUR SCHOOLS AND HEALTHCARE.

Without Prop. 3, California's 8 million public school and community college students face billions in cuts, including teacher layoffs, overcrowded classrooms and bigger class sizes. Families could lose access to preventive healthcare and affordable prescription drugs, and the Medi-Cal coverage that millions of Californians rely on could be put at risk.

PROP. 3 ONLY EXTENDS THE CURRENT TAX RATES ON THE WEALTHIEST TOP 2%.

Prop. 3 maintains the income tax rates that the wealthiest Californians have paid for the past 15 years. If those tax rates are allowed to expire, it would give millionaires and billionaires a massive tax cut at the expense of our classrooms, clinics and communities. Proposition 3 keeps the existing rates on the top 2% of incomes.

GUARANTEES THE MONEY REACHES THE CLASSROOM - NOT SACRAMENTO.

Proposition 3 includes Constitutional protections and tough accountability. It guarantees that funds from Proposition 3 go directly to local schools - the Legislature and Sacramento politicians cannot touch it, redirect it, or spend a single dollar on bureaucracy or administrative overhead. Prop. 3's school guarantee then frees up billions that help fund Medi-Cal for children, seniors and families.

Every dollar in Prop. 3 is independently audited every year and any official who misuses the money faces prosecution and criminal penalties. Local school districts must post annual accounting online to guarantee that Californians know exactly how and where funds are spent.

PROP. 3 SECURES OUR CHILDREN'S FUTURE.

For more than a decade, these revenues have helped fund critical programs California families and communities count on - from school lunches, smaller class sizes and mental health counselors to children's healthcare and Medi-Cal. They've also helped stave off cuts during economic downturns by investing more in the state's Rainy Day Fund, protecting our schools and healthcare when the economy slows. Proposition 3 keeps that progress going for the next generation.

PROP. 3 IS SUPPORTED BY TEACHERS, NURSES, AND HEALTHCARE WORKERS.

Yes on 3 is supported by:

  • California State PTA
  • California Federation of Teachers
  • California Nurses Association
  • California School Employees Association
  • California School Nurses Organization
  • California Teachers Association
  • Community College League of California
  • Nurse Alliance of SEIU California
  • Planned Parenthood Affiliates of CA

The educators in our classrooms and the nurses who care for our kids all agree: Vote YES on Proposition 3. Let's protect what matters most, without raising your taxes. Vote YES on Proposition 3.

www.YesProp3CA.com

David Goldberg, President
California Teachers Association
Katie Nilsson, RN, President
California School Nurses Organization
Jodi Hicks, President
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California

Respuesta al argumento a favor

De quienes se oponenFirmado por Jon Coupal, Carlos Solorzano, and Clint Olivier. Toque para leer.

NO ON PROP. 3 - STOP PERMANENTLY HIGHER INCOME TAXES

In 2012, politicians and special interests promised Californians that their income tax increases would be TEMPORARY. Now they're claiming that making those taxes permanent somehow ISN'T a tax increase at all. Don't buy it. Prop. 3 locks in what would become the largest permanent state income tax increase in California history - costing taxpayers up to $15 billion every year.

NO ON PROP. 3 - REMIND POLITICIANS WHAT "TEMPORARY" MEANS

Temporary: lasting for a limited time only; not permanent.

California taxpayers kept their end of the bargain - paying temporary higher income taxes for 16 years. Politicians should keep theirs and stop pushing for even higher taxes.

NO ON PROP. 3 - STOP WASTEFUL SPENDING

Prop. 3 does nothing to stop the waste, fraud and reckless spending that turned a $100 billion budget surplus into a $30 billion deficit in just three years. If Sacramento had spent responsibly, they wouldn't be asking taxpayers to make "temporary" taxes permanent.

NO ON PROP. 3 - DON'T MAKE CALIFORNIA EVEN MORE EXPENSIVE

Californians have the highest cost of living and pay the highest income, sales and gas taxes in America. Making a temporary tax permanent only makes California more expensive.

NO ON PROP. 3 - FIX THE SPENDING PROBLEM FIRST

California doesn't have a tax revenue problem - it has a spending problem. California's population grew by less than 2% in the past decade while the politicians doubled spending. Say no to permanently higher taxes. Join us to oppose higher income taxes at VoteNoProp3.com.

NO ON PROP. 3

Jon Coupal, President
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
Carlos Solorzano, CEO
Hispanic Chambers of Commerce of San Francisco
Clint Olivier, President
Central Valley Business Federation

Argumento en contra

De quienes se oponenFirmado por Robert Gutierrez, Robert Rivinius, and Julian Canete. Toque para leer.

PROP. 3 - TURNS "TEMPORARY" TAXES INTO PERMANENT HIGHER INCOME TAXES

Sacramento politicians make big promises to get our support for higher taxes. Then they spend our tax dollars with no accountability - losing billions to waste, fraud and overspending.

Take Prop. 3. Politicians told voters higher income taxes would be temporary - only for seven years to cover a budget deficit. Then those "temporary" taxes were extended for another 12 years with the promise to voters that the higher taxes would solve the problems the politicians created. Now the special interests and politicians want to make these higher income taxes PERMANENT.

California voters should say NO to PERMANENTLY higher income taxes.

PROP. 3 - HIGHER INCOME TAXES = HIGHER COST OF LIVING

Californians have the nation's highest cost of living partly because we also suffer from the highest income taxes, highest sales taxes and highest gas taxes of all fifty states. The same politicians also gave us the highest gasoline prices in the nation, higher insurance costs, higher utility costs, higher food costs, and higher housing costs. Now they want to make higher income taxes permanent, while adding new taxes on your health insurance, new taxes on software - and they are even considering a "jobs" tax. Say NO to INCREASING our cost of living with higher taxes.

PROP. 3 - VOTERS DESERVE REAL RESULTS, NOT BROKEN PROMISES

Waste, fraud and overspending by state government is not an excuse to raise our taxes even higher.

The politicians and special interests promised temporary income taxes were needed to avoid big cuts to government programs. Since the "temporary" increases were first passed, government spending has increased by $150 billion - a more than 2.5X increase. Over the same time period, our schools, infrastructure and public safety have gotten worse. Say NO to endless broken promises.

NO ON PROP. 3 - STOP WASTEFUL SPENDING

The politicians and special interests turned a $100 billion budget surplus into a $30 billion budget deficit in just three years. They mismanaged our tax dollars so badly, they now want voters to bail them out with permanently higher taxes.

Say NO to $100 billion wasted on a train to nowhere.

Say NO to $37 billion wasted on homeless programs that don't work.

Say NO to $31 billion wasted on unemployment fraud.

NO ON PROP. 3 - FIX SACRAMENTO'S SPENDING PROBLEM BEFORE RAISING TAXES

California doesn't have a revenue problem. We have a spending problem. California's population barely grew in the past 10 years, but the politicians more than doubled spending.

It's not just state taxes that keep going up. Politicians and special interests have imposed more than 2,000 new local tax increases in just the past ten years - making it much harder for struggling Californians to make ends meet.

Californians shouldn't support any higher taxes until we get spending under control.

STOP WASTEFUL SPENDING.

NO NEW TAXES.

NO ON PROP. 3.

Robert Gutierrez, President
California Taxpayers Association
Robert Rivinius, President
Family Business Association of California
Julian Canete, President
California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce

Respuesta al argumento en contra

De quienes apoyanFirmado por Jeff Freitas, Darrell Roberts, and Adam Weinberger. Toque para leer.

Proposition 3 protects our schools, our healthcare and our communities - without raising your taxes.

PROP. 3 KEEPS THE TAX RATES THE TOP 2% HAVE PAID FOR THE PAST 15 YEARS AND DOES NOT RAISE YOUR TAXES.

Prop. 3 maintains the current tax rates the wealthiest 2% of Californians have been paying for 15 years, ensuring couples that earn more than $740,000 continue to pay their fair share.

WITHOUT PROP. 3 MILLIONAIRES AND BILLIONAIRES GET A MASSIVE TAX CUT - AND THE REST OF US PAY FOR IT.

Teacher and staff layoffs, overcrowded classrooms and fewer counselors in our schools; cuts to Medi-Cal, children's healthcare and the clinics families rely on; and less for the firefighters, emergency response and wildfire protection that keep our communities safe.

PROP. 3 HAS STRICT ACCOUNTABILITY AND FUNDS EDUCATION DIRECTLY.

Prop. 3's funding goes straight to local schools and community colleges. Sacramento politicians cannot touch it or redirect it. Not one penny may be spent on bureaucracy or administrative overhead. Every dollar is independently audited every year, districts must post their spending online, and any official who misuses the money faces prosecution and criminal penalties.

PROP. 3 PROTECTS HEALTHCARE AND FIRE PROTECTION.

By guaranteeing funding for our classrooms, Prop. 3 ensures California can also invest in Medi-Cal and children's healthcare, and in the firefighters and wildfire protection our communities depend on. That's why teachers, school employees, nurses and firefighters agree: VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION 3.

www.YesProp3CA.com

Jeff Freitas, President
California Federation of Teachers
Darrell Roberts, President
California Professional Firefighters
Adam Weinberger, President
California School Employees Association

Fuente: Secretario de Estado de California, argumentos y refutaciones, al 15 de oct. de 2026

Qué posición tienen los grupos

Todos los grupos de nuestra lista, por categoría. Cada posición enlaza a la guía publicada por el propio grupo.

Definiciones de las etiquetas Las citas son las propias palabras de cada grupo, copiadas exactamente.

Partidos políticos

10 grupos

Los partidos estatales y del condado son grupos separados y pueden tener posiciones distintas.

Medios de noticias

5 grupos

Estos son los únicos medios de noticias que encontramos con respaldos publicados para esta elección. Sugiera otro.

Sindicatos

9 grupos

Organizaciones empresariales

3 grupos

Grupos cívicos y de buen gobierno

1 grupo
  • League of Women Voters of California

    Sí

    Sus palabras: "The League strongly supports the measure because it protects vital services, helps California weather economic downturns, and keeps the state's tax system fair."

    La guía de la League muestra su posición como una imagen. La cita viene de su explicación escrita.

    League of Women Voters of California Fuente, revisado el 6 de oct. de 2026

Grupos de causas y defensa

3 grupos

Sobre el resumen

Resumen redactado con IA a partir del análisis oficial y comparado con él mediante revisión automática. Lea el análisis oficial

Volver al resumen

Enviar una sugerencia

Sugiera un grupo para agregar, una medida que nos falta o una corrección. Leemos todas.

¿Qué sugiere?